BEGIN:VCALENDAR

VERSION:2.0

PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//6.6.4.4//EN

TZID:Asia/Jerusalem

X-WR-TIMEZONE:Asia/Jerusalem
BEGIN:VEVENT

UID:0-540@aerospace.technion.ac.il

DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Jerusalem:20150114T163000

DTEND;TZID=Asia/Jerusalem:20150114T173000

DTSTAMP:20230603T193708Z

URL:https://aerospace.technion.ac.il/events/critical-examination-of-functi
 onal-decomposition-and-morphology-as-an-engineering-design-teaching-method
 /

SUMMARY:Critical Examination of Functional Decomposition and Morphology as 
 an Engineering Design Teaching Method
DESCRIPTION:Lecturer:Michael Press\n Faculty:Department of Aerospace Engine
 ering\,\n Institute:Technion – Israel Institute of Technology\n Location
 :Classroom 165\, ground floor\, Library\, Aerospace Eng.\n Zoom: \n Abstra
 ct: \n Details: \n Engineering design is a highly complex cognitive proces
 s of solving problems by developing new solutions and products. In the pas
 t this process was accomplished using intuition and experience\, until a r
 ealization came that a methodology must be developed in order that novice 
 designers could produce good solutions. One of the methods was developed i
 n Germany by Pahl and Beitz\, who attempted to answer the need by introduc
 ing the Systematic Design methodology\, also known as the Rational Model. 
 At the heart of the rational model lies the Functional Decomposition and M
 orphology (FD&amp\;M) method for the phase of conceptual design. Nowadays\
 , FD&amp\;M is the most popular method taught in engineering schools.\nThe
  present research investigates the FD&amp\;M method in educating engineers
  through an experiment conducted on students (N=29) in the faculty of aero
 space engineering. Participants were both undergraduate and graduate stude
 nts. The application of the method was studied in analyzing an existing de
 vice and for the purpose of new product design. The research was based on 
 analysis of design reports in the form of submitted homework assignments a
 nd of a self-reflection questionnaire that was generated for the purpose o
 f the research. The investigation revealed many difficulties and shortcomi
 ngs of the FD&amp\;M method\, classified into 10 different problematic asp
 ects that were recognized and demonstrated. The analysis indicated that th
 e method is quite difficult to apply\, is non-intuitive and most of the ti
 me is a hindrance to innovation. The results also showed that the method i
 s much more complicated than initially perceived by students.
CATEGORIES:Seminars
LOCATION:Classroom 165\, ground floor\, Library\, Aerospace Eng.

END:VEVENT

BEGIN:VTIMEZONE

TZID:Asia/Jerusalem

X-LIC-LOCATION:Asia/Jerusalem

BEGIN:STANDARD

DTSTART:20141026T010000

TZOFFSETFROM:+0300

TZOFFSETTO:+0200

TZNAME:IST

END:STANDARD

END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR